Yesterday was an awful day in the history of this committee, and Senator Shelton White House didn’t mince words. He called it out for what it was: a display of double standards around truth and accountability.
He started with Pam Bondi, whose statements to the committee were provably false. Bondi alleged that White House and the ranking member had received campaign contributions from someone she called a close Epstein confidant. But as White House pointed out, every federal contribution is tracked by the FEC—checkable, objective, yes or no. The allegation was false, and yet it went uncorrected.
Then came the FBI director, Patel, whose testimony in the Mar-a-Lago case was used to justify dodging questions. He claimed DOJ had sealed his grand jury testimony and that a court order barred him from speaking. Both claims were demonstrably false—the chief judge confirmed nothing prevented him from testifying. When pressed a second time, Patel said he couldn’t answer because his transcript was being publicly released. Again, false. And the attorney general, sitting there, did nothing to correct the record, leaving the misimpressions to stand.

White House’s point was stark: on one day, someone is prosecuted for allegedly lying to Congress. The next, high-ranking officials make verifiable false statements and face no consequences. Lying under oath becomes a weapon, applied selectively depending on convenience and allegiance.
This isn’t just anger for drama’s sake. It’s a warning: congressional oversight only works if truth matters equally to all. If powerful figures can mislead without consequence, the system collapses into theater, with law and accountability selectively enforced.
For the viewer, the takeaway is clear: always ask—who else is being held to the same standard? And when leaders talk about law and order, do they mean it for everyone or only for those they oppose? Noticing these double standards is the first step to holding the powerful accountable.
News
🚨 BREAKING: Pam Bondi reportedly faces ouster at the DOJ amid a fresh debacle highlighting alleged incompetence and mismanagement. As media and insiders dissect the fallout, questions swirl about accountability, political consequences, and who might replace her—while critics claim this marks a turning point in ongoing institutional controversies.
DOJ Missteps, Government Waste, and the Holiday Spirit Welcome to the big show, everyone. I’m Trish Regan, and first, let…
🚨 FIERY HEARING: Jasmine Crockett reportedly dominates a Louisiana racist opponent during a tense public hearing, delivering sharp rebuttals and sparking nationwide attention. Social media erupts as supporters cheer, critics react, and insiders debate the political and cultural impact, leaving many questioning how this showdown will shape her rising influence.
Protecting Individual Rights and Promoting Equality: A Congressional Debate In a recent session at Congress, members from both sides of…
🚨 ON-AIR DISASTER: “The View” hosts reportedly booed off the street after controversial prison comments backfired, sparking public outrage and media frenzy. Ratings reportedly plunge further as social media erupts, insiders scramble to contain the fallout, and critics question whether the show can recover from this unprecedented backlash.
ABC’s The View continues to struggle with declining ratings, and much of the blame is being placed on hosts Sunny…
🚨 LIVE COLLAPSE: Mrvan’s question, “Where did the data go?”, reportedly exposed Patel’s “100% confident” claim as false just 47 seconds later, sparking an intense on-air meltdown. Critics and insiders question credibility, accountability, and transparency, as the incident sends shockwaves through politics and media circles alike.
On March 18, 2025, during a House Judiciary Committee hearing, Congressman Frank Mirvan exposed a major FBI data security breach….
🚨 LIVE SHOCKER: Hillary Clinton reportedly reels as Megyn Kelly and Tulsi Gabbard call her out on live television, sparking a viral political confrontation. With tensions high, viewers are debating the fallout, insiders weigh in, and questions arise about Clinton’s response and the potential impact on her legacy.
This segment explores claims that the Russia investigation was allegedly linked to actions by the Hillary Clinton campaign during the…
🚨 MUST-SEE CLASH: Jasmine Crockett reportedly fires back at Nancy Mace following an alleged physical threat, igniting a heated public showdown. Social media explodes as supporters rally, critics debate, and insiders warn this confrontation could have major political and personal repercussions for both parties involved.
I’m joined today by Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett to discuss a recent clash with Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace during the latest…
End of content
No more pages to load





