Bill O’Reilly and Congressman Jared Moskowitz sat down for a lively, no-spin discussion about the economy, politics, and how voters are reacting to the current moment. And as usual, the conversation turned sharp, funny, and surprisingly honest.

Moskowitz began by arguing that everyday Americans are feeling the squeeze financially, regardless of what any administration says. He pointed out that people hear optimistic messaging, but when they visit the grocery store or see their bills, it simply doesn’t match the reality they’re living.

The conversation then shifted to optics and political messaging. Moskowitz joked about high-profile events, saying the contrast between luxury imagery and discussions about reducing benefits creates a disconnect that voters pick up on immediately.

When the topic turned to the economy, O’Reilly brought up the viral debate about the $36 cheeseburger. Moskowitz laughed it off, saying he went to a simple fast-food spot instead—highlighting how normal people feel about rising prices.

Later, the panel tackled a heavier topic: political polarization. Moskowitz argued that both major parties now have fringe factions that create tension, and that this polarization affects voter migration between states. He referenced Florida’s dramatic registration shift over the last decade as an example of how people are adjusting their political identities based on where they move.

The discussion then veered into the broader economic picture. Moskowitz warned that when corporate compensation reaches extreme levels, public frustration naturally grows. O’Reilly countered that outcomes still vary dramatically depending on the state, which opens a deeper debate about economic policy at the local level.

From there, the conversation moved into cultural trends and online movements—some humorous, some bizarre—before swinging back to the core issue: the economy. Moskowitz said Democrats once tried to convince voters that economic indicators reflected everyday life, and it didn’t work. Now, he argues, Trump is trying the same strategy by insisting that things are improving, despite voters seeing higher prices in their daily lives.

His central message: people believe their receipts, not political advertising. And no matter who is in charge, if the cost of living keeps rising, voters will feel it immediately.