SHOCKING: Jemele Hill calls Angel Reese the “Michael Jordan of the WNBA” – and says she’s ALREADY better than Caitlin Clark!

This take lit social media on fire. Is it confidence, bias, or vision? Fans are feuding, and the Reese–Clark rivalry just hit a whole new level.

The 2025 WNBA season is shaping up to be one of the most electric in recent memory—and not just because of the talent on the court. From packed arenas to record-breaking ratings, women’s basketball is finally enjoying its long-overdue moment in the sun. Yet amid all this excitement, there’s a dark cloud of discourse hovering over the league, one driven less by athletic analysis and more by uncomfortable cultural tension.

Much of that tension has crystallized around two young stars: Caitlin Clark, the Iowa phenom turned Indiana Fever rookie sensation, and Angel Reese, the unapologetic LSU champion now lighting up the Chicago Sky. Every play they make, every comment they share, and every foul exchanged between them is instantly dissected, replayed, and argued about online. But why? Why do these two competitors—both supremely talented, both fierce and focused—invite such relentless debate?

To understand that, we need to step back and unpack the narratives that have surrounded them since college. Because what’s happening now isn’t just about basketball. It’s about race, gender, media framing, and how we, as a society, choose our heroes and villains.

A Rivalry the Media Was Desperate to Create

When Clark and Reese clashed in the 2023 NCAA Championship, it was a television dream come true: a white superstar with limitless shooting range versus a Black powerhouse who dominated the paint and talked just as much game. The postgame hand gestures and pointed celebrations ignited the internet. “Classless” was the word hurled at Reese. “Fiery competitor” was used for Clark. And just like that, the sports world had crowned its narrative—Reese, the villain. Clark, the golden girl.

But the truth is far more complex. These are two young women at the top of their game, competing in a league where physicality and passion have always been part of the fabric. So why are we so uncomfortable letting them be what they are—athletes?

Jemele Hill recently addressed this imbalance on her podcast, Spolitics, calling out the media’s obsession with personalizing what should be professional competition. “RGIII’s opinion wasn’t a sports take,” she said, referring to Robert Griffin III’s viral suggestion that Reese “hates” Clark. “His observation isn’t about basketball. It’s about projecting something deeper—something personal and unverified.”

💬 Other people who read this also checked out 👀

Hill’s critique gets to the heart of the issue. Reese and Clark’s interactions, whether friendly, neutral, or competitive, have become lightning rods for cultural interpretation. But more often than not, these interpretations say more about us—our biases, our discomforts—than they do about the players themselves.

Angel Reese Isn’t the Villain. She’s the Reality Check.

Angel Reese has never shied away from the spotlight. She knows who she is and what she represents: a confident, expressive Black woman thriving in a space that hasn’t always welcomed athletes who look or act like her. Her willingness to speak her mind and play with swagger is magnetic to fans—but also polarizing in a media landscape that still struggles with confident Black femininity.

“She’s so unapologetic about who she is,” Hill pointed out. “She plays with passion, she shows up at the Met Gala, she speaks her truth. And people resent that—especially coming from a young Black woman.”

It’s not just about basketball anymore. Reese’s identity has become a cultural mirror, reflecting back society’s unresolved discomfort with bold, successful Black women. Hill argued that when Reese speaks about being overlooked in the marketing push behind women’s basketball, she’s speaking from a place many Black women understand.

“She just wants the same credit Caitlin Clark gets,” Hill said. “And she’s not wrong to ask for it.”

Clark herself has acknowledged the privilege she benefits from. So have other white stars like Kelsey Plum and Paige Bueckers. They’ve recognized that they receive a different kind of visibility and endorsement love—because they’re not just great athletes, but ones who fit a mold that corporate America is more comfortable promoting.

Reese knows that. And she’s choosing not to conform. She’s choosing to make noise, take space, and demand equal footing.

Competitiveness Isn’t a Crime—Unless You’re a Woman

Here’s where the double standard gets ugly. When male athletes go toe-to-toe, get in each other’s faces, or talk trash, it’s celebrated. Michael Jordan’s ruthless domination of rivals? Iconic. Larry Bird and Magic Johnson’s icy stares and elbows? Legendary. Even recent NBA battles—like Devin Booker jawing with Luka Dončić—get framed as “must-see TV.”

But when Reese bumps Clark on the way to the rim, or when Clark delivers a hard screen, the conversation shifts. Suddenly it’s not just about physicality—it’s about intent, about narrative. “Does she hate her?” “Is there beef?” “What’s the deeper meaning here?”

Why can’t it just be about competition?

“For some reason, when it comes to Angel Reese and Caitlin Clark, we simply refuse to view their competitiveness through the same lens,” Hill said. “Maybe they hate each other. Maybe they don’t. Who cares? That shouldn’t be the story.”

And yet, here we are. Every time they share a court, cameras zoom in. Thinkpieces are published. Tweets fly. The WNBA has become the battleground for a cultural war that its players didn’t ask to fight.

Let Them Be Great—On Their Terms

The irony, of course, is that all this attention—however messy—is proof that the WNBA has arrived. Sports are culture. And whenever culture shifts, there’s friction. What we’re witnessing isn’t just a league growing in viewership. It’s a league demanding to be seen on its own terms.

Reese and Clark are part of that. They’re two stars on different teams, with different styles and different identities. But they’re both elevating the game. They’re drawing new fans, inspiring younger athletes, and creating moments that will live in highlight reels for years.

And yet, the constant demand to assign them roles—hero and villain, angel and devil—is exhausting. It’s also unfair.

“I want us to graduate to a point where whether or not they like each other is utterly irrelevant,” Hill said. “Angel Reese is not the villain in Caitlin Clark’s story. Caitlin Clark is not the savior in Angel Reese’s. Every interaction between them is not a thinkpiece.”

That’s the goal. A sports culture where two women can be great in different ways, without being turned into avatars for society’s discomfort.

The Bigger Picture

The WNBA doesn’t need a forced rivalry to thrive. It already has the talent, the storylines, and now the ratings to prove it. From Sabrina Ionescu’s jaw-dropping performances in New York to A’ja Wilson’s MVP-caliber play in Las Vegas, the league is deeper than any one rivalry. And that’s the point.

We don’t need to reduce it all to a two-woman drama. That’s lazy. And it sells short what’s actually happening—a historic moment in women’s sports, where excellence is being redefined in real time.

So the next time Reese and Clark cross paths on the court, let’s take a breath. Let them play. Let them be competitive, emotional, aggressive. Let them be exactly what we cheer for in male athletes.

Because the future of women’s basketball isn’t about who’s the hero or the heel. It’s about letting these women own their narratives, without having them rewritten by people who never played a single second in their shoes.

If you can celebrate hard-nosed rivalries in the NBA without flinching, you can do the same in the WNBA.

Apply that same energy. And let us all enjoy the game.