Bảng Jeopardy có sự góp mặt của Paige Bueckers

Jeopardy! Contestant’s Epic Blunder Mixing Up Paige Bueckers and Caitlin Clark Sparks Outrage and Hilarious Reactions

In the ever-growing world of women’s basketball, few names shine brighter than Caitlin Clark and Paige Bueckers. Both players have captivated fans with their incredible skill, competitive fire, and game-changing impact on the WNBA. But as their respective careers unfold, one thing is becoming increasingly clear — the world still doesn’t always know who is who.

Case in point: A now-viral moment on the iconic quiz show Jeopardy! has sent shockwaves across the internet — and not for the right reasons.

The Clue Heard ‘Round the Court

During a recent episode of Jeopardy!, contestants were given a sports-related clue in a WNBA-themed category. The clue read:

“This UConn star had a thrilling spring in 2025, playing for her first national championship team and going No. 1 overall in the WNBA Draft.”

To help the contestants along, a photo of Paige Bueckers — the real answer to the question — was clearly displayed on screen.

Yet, despite the visual aid and the context clue referencing UConn, one contestant confidently buzzed in:

“Who is Caitlin Clark?”

A painful pause followed. Then the host — with restrained dismay — answered, “No.”

UConn Fans Lose Their Minds Online

Almost instantly, a clip of the moment was shared on X (formerly Twitter), with one sportswriter captioning it:

“UConn fans, shield your eyes and ears.”

The moment spread like wildfire. Fans of women’s college basketball, particularly those who followed the historic rivalry between Iowa’s Caitlin Clark and UConn’s Paige Bueckers, were both amused and horrified.

Some couldn’t believe the mistake. Others joked that it wasn’t surprising — after all, Jeopardy! contestants are known for being able to recite the core temperature of the Earth or the chemical composition of Martian soil, but often stumble the second a sports question comes up.

Still, for followers of the WNBA, the blunder was a stark reminder of how far women’s sports still has to go in terms of mainstream cultural recognition — even for its brightest stars.

Two Stars, One Legacy of Comparison

To understand why this moment hit a nerve, you need to understand the deep, intertwined paths of Caitlin Clark and Paige Bueckers.

Clark, the explosive point guard from Iowa, captured national attention with her deep threes, court vision, and record-breaking scoring. Her name became synonymous with the modern evolution of women’s basketball. She went on to become the No. 1 pick in the 2024 WNBA Draft, joining the Indiana Fever amid massive fanfare.

Bueckers, meanwhile, starred at UConn, one of the most historic programs in NCAA women’s basketball history. Despite suffering injuries during college, she led a stunning comeback in 2025 — taking her team to a national title and then getting drafted No. 1 in the 2025 WNBA Draft by the Dallas Wings.

Both women were high school phenoms. Both were projected superstars. Both are now WNBA rookies, playing in a league that’s riding a wave of unprecedented attention.

And yet — one of them still gets confused for the other on national television.

Stats Don’t Lie — But Recognition Does

What makes the Jeopardy! moment more surprising is that Paige Bueckers is having a stellar rookie season.

As of this writing, she’s averaging:

18.1 points per game

5.4 assists

4.1 rebounds

She’s become an integral part of the Wings’ offense and is one of the top contenders for WNBA Rookie of the Year — alongside, of course, Angel Reese and Caitlin Clark.

But while Bueckers is thriving, it’s clear that Clark continues to command a disproportionately large share of media attention.

That’s not Clark’s fault. She’s earned her fame — setting scoring records at Iowa, becoming the face of Nike, and drawing unprecedented crowds to women’s basketball games. Her rise is historic and deserves celebration.

Still, the Jeopardy! confusion seemed to underscore a deeper issue: Are other women’s basketball stars being overshadowed by the Caitlin Clark media machine?

Clark’s Return to the Court Falls Flat

Ironically, the Jeopardy! episode aired just as Caitlin Clark returned to the floor for the Indiana Fever after missing five straight games due to injury.

Her much-anticipated comeback, however, did not go as planned.

Facing off against the Golden State Valkyries, the Fever were thoroughly outplayed, losing 80–61. Clark struggled, shooting just 4-of-12 from the field. She finished with:

10 points

6 assists

5 rebounds

4 turnovers

25 minutes played

It was a far cry from her early-season average of 33.3 minutes per game and strong performances during her first nine contests. Whether the coaching staff is easing her back into action or simply reacting to her on-court struggles, her playing time has noticeably dipped.

Regardless, the media spotlight remains firmly fixed on Clark — even when her numbers are subpar and other rookies are outshining her statistically.

What the Jeopardy Moment Reveals About Sports Fandom

More than just a trivia fail, the Jeopardy! blunder triggered a larger conversation online:

Why does the public know Caitlin Clark so well but struggle to identify Paige Bueckers, despite her elite performance?

Is the media doing enough to promote the WNBA as a league full of stars — not just one?

And how can fans and outlets better educate casual audiences about the depth of talent in women’s basketball?

Some fans came to the defense of the contestant, pointing out that Caitlin Clark is the most talked-about name in women’s basketball, so it’s an understandable (if unfortunate) mistake.

Others weren’t so forgiving.

“They literally showed a picture of Paige and said UConn in the clue,” one fan posted. “That’s like showing LeBron James and someone answering ‘Who is Steph Curry?’”

A League Bigger Than One Name

As the WNBA continues to grow in popularity, moments like this serve as both caution and opportunity.

Yes, the Caitlin Clark effect is real — she’s boosted ratings, ticket sales, and merchandise in ways the league hasn’t seen in decades. But if the league becomes too reliant on a single player’s identity, it risks undervaluing the incredible stories around her.

Players like Angel Reese, Paige Bueckers, A’ja Wilson, Aliyah Boston, Kelsey Plum, and so many more are writing their own chapters in WNBA history. The league is richer — and far more entertaining — when its stars are recognized equally.

The Final Buzzer: More Than a Mistake

The Jeopardy! moment may seem like a harmless error on the surface — a funny clip for social media to laugh at for a day or two.

But in reality, it exposed the gaps that still exist between the real impact of women’s sports and the broader public’s understanding of them.

It’s a reminder that visibility isn’t just about screen time — it’s about knowing the faces, the stories, and the journeys behind the game.

Caitlin Clark deserves the spotlight — no question.

But so does Paige Bueckers.

And when a trivia show can’t tell the difference, maybe it’s time we start asking better questions