Curtis Sliwa Slams Cuomo and Mamdani Over Raise the Age Law Amid Final Mayoral Debate

NEW YORK, N.Y. — The final mayoral debate Wednesday night in New York City turned increasingly heated as candidates and political figures clashed over controversial policies, including the Raise the Age law, which raised the age at which minors can be prosecuted as adults to 18.

Curtis Sliwa, the longtime radio personality and Republican candidate, targeted both former Governor Andrew Cuomo and anti-Israel front-runner Zohran Mamdani, saying their support for the legislation was unacceptable.

“It’s personal for me,” Sliwa declared. “This law has consequences for real people in this city. It’s not just numbers on a page — it’s families, victims, and communities paying the price.”

The exchange came during a chaotic moment in the debate, following Cuomo’s unexpected interruption of Mamdani as the progressive candidate attempted to reassure Jewish voters that he would represent all communities fairly. Sliwa used the opportunity to attack both men’s records on criminal justice, arguing that the Raise the Age law has made New York streets less safe by limiting prosecutorial options for serious crimes committed by 16- and 17-year-olds.

The Raise the Age Controversy

The Raise the Age law, enacted in 2017 under Cuomo’s administration, was intended to protect young people from the long-term consequences of adult criminal records. Supporters say it helps rehabilitate minors rather than punish them, while critics argue it puts communities at risk by treating serious offenders too leniently.

Sliwa, echoing concerns from parents and victims’ advocates, emphasized that the law has had tangible negative impacts, claiming that violent crimes committed by teens have increased as a result.

“This isn’t political theory — it’s personal. I know people whose lives have been affected, and I can’t stay silent,” Sliwa said.

Mamdani and Cuomo Respond

Mamdani defended his stance on criminal justice reforms, stating that rehabilitation and prevention are more effective than punitive measures for young offenders.

“We need policies that give our youth a chance to turn their lives around,” Mamdani said. “Treating teenagers as adults does more harm than good, both for them and for society.”

Cuomo, meanwhile, reiterated that the law was enacted to modernize the justice system, while also highlighting other safety measures implemented during his tenure as governor.

Election Implications

With election day just days away, these clashes over criminal justice and community safety policies are shaping voter perceptions. Analysts note that Sliwa’s personal approach may resonate with voters concerned about safety, while Mamdani’s emphasis on rehabilitation appeals to progressive and younger constituencies.

Observers also highlight that Cuomo’s interjection during the debate, combined with Sliwa’s fiery attacks, created a media spectacle that could influence undecided voters in the final stretch.

The Final Stretch

As the race heads into its closing days, the battle over criminal justice reform, public safety, and community representation remains at the forefront of voters’ minds. Whether Sliwa’s personal appeals or Mamdani’s progressive vision will carry the day is uncertain, but the debate has undoubtedly set the stage for a high-stakes finish in New York City politics.