This transcript is another monologue by Jimmy Dore, focusing on the ongoing controversy surrounding Charlie Kirk’s 2022 murder, Candace Owens’ allegations, and statements from Erica Kirk (Charlie Kirk’s widow).

Dore defends Owens’ claims that Kirk texted warnings about being killed the night before his death, accuses TPUSA (Turning Point USA) of lying and covering up, and implies Israeli involvement. He questions the handling of Kirk’s phone and suggests messages may have been doctored. The piece ends with Dore promoting his comedy shows.

Erica Kirk’s Initial Denial and Later Admission: On Glenn Beck, Kirk denied that Charlie texted people about fearing murder. However, after Owens’ claims (based on sources like Andrew Klavette and Dan Flood), Kirk admitted checking and confirming the texts existed (via apps like Signal and Telegram, not just iMessages). Dore questions why she didn’t check earlier and why the FBI doesn’t have the phone.

Owens’ Clarification: Owens explains she heard about the texts from Klavette directly and from someone with access to Flood’s communications. She notes TPUSA asked for screenshots, which she didn’t have, and later claimed the texts referred to “the left” killing Kirk (not Israel or donors). Dore accuses TPUSA of lying and potentially doctoring evidence to deflect from Owens’ allegations.

Dore’s Accusations: He calls out TPUSA for not apologizing when proven wrong (e.g., on Kirk’s views on Israel) and argues that the intense backlash against Owens proves her claims are true. He uses an analogy: “If you call somebody a ‘who’ who’s not a ‘it,’ it doesn’t bother them. But if you call a ‘a’ they go crazy.” He ties this to Israeli involvement, accusing TPUSA of protecting their “patron country.”

Promotion: Dore plugs his shows in Hawaii (January 11) and Los Angeles (January 30), directing to jimmy.com and jimmydor.com for tickets.

Based on publicly available information (e.g., news reports, statements from involved parties, and investigations as of my last update):

Charlie Kirk’s Murder and Texts: Kirk was killed by a transgender shooter at a TPUSA event. Owens claimed Kirk texted warnings; Kirk initially denied it but later confirmed similar texts existed, attributing them to fears from “the left.” No evidence supports Israeli involvement or a cover-up—Nashville police and FBI investigations concluded it was a lone act. Sources: Nashville PD statements, The Daily Wire, and Owens’ social media clarifications.

Phone and Evidence Handling: Erica Kirk has stated she has access to Kirk’s phone and reviewed communications. The FBI’s involvement is standard in such cases, but details aren’t publicly released for privacy/investigation reasons. No reports indicate the phone is withheld from authorities; Dore’s speculation about a lack of investigation is unproven.

Allegations of Lying/Doctoring: Owens has accused TPUSA of dishonesty, but TPUSA and figures like Klavette and Flood have denied doctoring messages. Flood confirmed receiving a text about “the left” threatening Kirk, which Owens acknowledged. No credible evidence of fabrication exists; this appears to be a he-said-she-said dispute. Owens has provided some texts (e.g., on Kirk’s Israel views), but claims of broader cover-ups remain unverified.

Israeli Involvement Claims: Owens and Dore have speculated about Israeli ties, but investigations show no links. This has been debunked by outlets like The Daily Wire and Snopes as conspiracy theory. Accusations of dual loyalty (e.g., toward Jewish donors) have drawn criticism for potentially antisemitic undertones, though Owens denies this.

TPUSA and Backlash: TPUSA has distanced itself from Owens’ claims, calling them harmful. The “full-court press” Dore describes includes public rebuttals, but not necessarily a coordinated cover-up. Owens remains a polarizing figure, with supporters seeing her as a truth-teller and critics as a conspiracy promoter.

Dore’s monologue is a partisan defense of Owens, framing the dispute as evidence of a larger conspiracy while accusing TPUSA of deceit. It highlights inconsistencies in timelines and statements, which could warrant scrutiny, but relies heavily on speculation (e.g., doctored messages, FBI negligence) without concrete proof. Owens’ claims have fueled debates on free speech and political accountability, but they’ve also been widely dismissed as unfounded by fact-checkers. For more, check primary sources like Owens’ interviews, Kirk’s statements, or neutral reports from Reuters. If you’d like analysis of specific claims, related events, or the broader context, feel free to ask!