WNBA star Sophie Cunningham just revealed some shocking news about Caitlin Clark, who is leaving the league in a civil war, she reaffirmed what Clark said and now she’s doing it!

In the rapidly evolving world of the WNBA, where a new generation of superstars has ignited a level of public interest and media scrutiny never seen before, a single statement from a veteran player can set off a firestorm. But when Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham, a fiery and unfiltered voice in the league, doubled down on her bold and viral declaration that her teammate, Caitlin Clark, is the “face of the WNBA,” she wasn’t just offering an opinion; she was issuing a powerful challenge that has the league on the brink of a full-blown civil war. Her comments, a raw and passionate defense of Clark’s role in the WNBA’s explosive growth, have ignited a fierce debate about everything from player rivalries to the true source of the league’s newfound success.

The controversy began when Cunningham, in an appearance on her new podcast, “Show Me Something,” revisited a topic that has become a flashpoint for fans and critics alike. She acknowledged the immense talent of other players in the league, a necessary nod to a roster of established stars who have helped build the WNBA’s foundation. But she didn’t shy away from her core belief, a sentiment that has now been amplified and debated across every major media platform: “It just kind of pisses me off,” she said, with a blunt honesty that is rarely seen in professional sports, “when people say that she’s not the face of the WNBA.” Her point was simple and powerful: the WNBA would not be enjoying its current level of unprecedented success—from record-breaking viewership to sold-out arenas—without the arrival of Caitlin Clark.

This is a profoundly risky stance, particularly for a veteran player. The WNBA is a tight-knit community, and the debate over who is its most important star is a sensitive and often volatile one. By so passionately and publicly defending Clark, Cunningham is not just a teammate; she is a lightning rod, a figure who is willing to challenge a narrative that many within the league have tried to push back against. Her comments have given a powerful voice to the legion of fans who believe that the league, and its media partners, are unfairly diminishing Clark’s role, and it has turned what was once a quiet debate into a national spectacle.

Cunningham also tackled another explosive topic: the physical play directed at Clark by veteran players. In the early days of Clark’s rookie season, many fans and media members were outraged by what they saw as overly aggressive and at times unsportsmanlike conduct. Cunningham, in her unfiltered style, offered a different perspective. She argued that a certain level of physical play is a “welcome-to-the-W moment” that all rookies endure. She backed up her point by sharing her own war stories, recalling a broken finger, a broken jaw, and a broken elbow that she suffered as a rookie. Her point was clear: this is just the nature of the game. However, she also acknowledged that the physicality directed at Clark might have been amplified due to the intense attention now on the league. This nuance is crucial, as it suggests that while the physical play may be common, the reaction to it is not, and that is a direct result of the “Caitlin Clark effect.”

The implications of Cunningham’s comments are profound. They have not only reignited a debate about who is the face of the WNBA but have also exposed a deep and passionate divide in the league over its history, its present, and its future. For a long time, the WNBA has been a league of insiders, a world that was only accessible to a small, devoted fan base. But with the arrival of Clark, that world has been blown wide open, and now the entire country is watching. Cunningham’s comments are a testament to the fact that this new reality is not without its growing pains. It has created a schism between those who believe the new attention is a natural evolution and those who feel that the league is forgetting its roots. Her comments, like a perfectly placed pass, have landed at a critical moment in the league’s history, and they have forced a conversation that everyone, from the players to the front office, is now forced to have. The WNBA may be thriving, but as Sophie Cunningham has proven, it is also on the brink of a fascinating, and potentially brutal, civil war.