Lia Thomas, a former University of Pennsylvania swimmer, became a world-renowned icon after winning several major races and breaking college records, despite fierce criticism from some athletes and organizations. To her supporters, she embodied the right of transgender athletes to compete in the category corresponding to their gender identity. To her detractors, she represented a “danger to athletic fairness,” arguing that her initial male build gave her a physical advantage that was deemed unfair.

In a blunt and unequivocal statement, the NCAA explained that this decision followed a “reevaluation of eligibility criteria” and “considerable pressure from external stakeholders.” While the organization does not directly name these “outside influences,” many sports analysts point to the impact of conservative lobbies and alumni groups that have long called for Thomas’s results to be overturned.

Perhaps the most unexpected aspect of this affair was the immediate awarding of all the titles and medals stripped from Lia Thomas to her direct rival: Riley Gaines. This American swimmer, a fierce opponent of the participation of transgender women in women’s competitions, had established herself as one of the most vocal voices from the conservative camp in this debate. Gaines, who had finished second or third behind Thomas in several events, now retrospectively reclaims all those top spots, etching her name onto the official NCAA record books.

In a public statement, Riley Gaines hailed it as “a victory for biological truth and for every female athlete who has felt betrayed in recent years.” She also expressed her “gratitude to all those who contributed to this courageous decision,” without specifying who she was referring to. Her supporters saw the decision as a belated redress of an “injustice.” Opponents saw it as a dangerous precedent that could further restrict the rights of transgender athletes in the future.

LGBTQ+ rights groups immediately expressed outrage. Several voices denounced the decision as “retrograde, motivated by ideological considerations rather than scientific facts.” Sports lawyers have already announced that legal action is being considered on behalf of Lia Thomas, arguing that the revocation violates her fundamental rights and constitutes blatant discrimination.

Behind the scenes, this decision could have broader repercussions for American sports policy. Many colleges and universities may revise their own eligibility regulations to comply with the NCAA’s new line. Some also fear that this case could trigger a wave of reviews of past athletic results, potentially plunging college sports into unprecedented legal and moral instability.

Lia Thomas, for her part, has yet to speak publicly since the announcement. Those close to her say she sees this decision as a profound betrayal, as she had always defended her participation as a legitimate right. For now, the former champion is remaining silent, but many expect her to make her voice heard very soon, perhaps even in court.

Meanwhile, Riley Gaines savors what she considers a historic victory, while unwittingly becoming another symbol of a debate that deeply divides sports, society, and politics. One thing is certain: this story is only just beginning, and American college sports may emerge profoundly transformed.