Candace Owens Claims French Assassination Plot, Sparks Online Frenzy

Right-wing influencer Candace Owens recently made headlines after alleging that French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte Macron plotted to assassinate her. Posting on X, Owens claimed she received the information from a “high-ranking French government official” and deemed it credible enough to share publicly. She added that Charlie Kirk was allegedly targeted as part of the same multinational operation, with professional units authorized to carry it out and $1.5 million allegedly allocated for the plot.

Public and Expert Reactions

Responses to Owens’ claims were mixed but largely skeptical:

Brandon Darby, a conservative blogger, described her post as “completely insane” and akin to someone in need of psychiatric care.

Author Alex Baronson warned viewers they were witnessing a potential “psychotic breakdown” in real time, urging those close to Owens to intervene.

Comedian Dave Smith expressed cautious concern, noting the stakes if Owens’ claims were somehow true.

The general consensus online, however, leaned toward skepticism, with many questioning Owens’ mental state or motives.

History of Controversy

Owens has a track record of provocative claims:

Earlier this year, the Macrons filed a defamation lawsuit against her for suggesting Brigitte Macron was born male.

She has frequently claimed global conspiracies targeting her, often without evidence.

Past incidents, including her commentary on Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassination plot, have been criticized for lacking verifiable proof.

Concerns About Credibility and Audience

Commentators noted that Owens’ large following—over 5.5 million on YouTube and 7 million on X—amplifies her claims, even when unsubstantiated:

Questions arise about who she is speaking to and what her audience gains from engaging with these claims.

Critics argue that sensational claims without evidence can be dismissed, regardless of the source.

Evidence—or Lack Thereof

A key point in the discussion:

Owens’ allegations have no concrete evidence beyond supposed insider information.

Unlike other controversial theories later substantiated (e.g., the lab-leak theory of COVID-19), Owens has yet to provide timestamps, documentation, or verifiable proof.

Without supporting evidence, authorities and the public cannot treat these claims seriously.

Takeaways

While Owens’ claims are alarming in content, they currently lack substantiation.

The situation highlights the dangers of social media amplification and the fine line between conspiratorial speculation and credible threat reporting.

Experts argue that if Owens genuinely fears for her safety, the proper channels should be used to submit verifiable evidence rather than broad public accusations.