-
Shaquille O’Neal EXPLODES in Controversy—Calls Angel Reese an ‘Idiot’ Live, Igniting Social Media Fury NBA legend Shaq shocked fans by insulting WNBA star Angel Reese with a brutal slur. The backlash was instant and fierce, demanding respect, accountability, and a public apology. What really happened behind the scenes—and will Shaq’s legacy survive this storm? The fallout is just beginning.
After calling Angel Reese an “idiot” live on-air, Shaquille O’Neal is facing an online firestorm. WNBA fans, athletes, and even…
-
BREAKING: Angel Reese Seething After LeBron James Publicly Praises Caitlin Clark—What He Said Sparked Instant Outrage and Left Reese Fuming. Fans Are Picking Sides, Social Media’s on Fire, and the Tension Between WNBA Stars and NBA Legends Just Reached a Whole New Level. WATCH the Fallout Unfold!
LATEST NEWS: Angel Reese FURIOUS After Lebron James Said This About Caitlin Clark! LeBron Didn’t Say Much—But It Was Enough…
-
Angel Reese Fined $25,000 After Screaming “F* You” at Caitlin Clark—Three Times During Heated Flagrant Foul Clash! WNBA Drops Harsh Penalty as Fans Explode Online, Debating Double Standards, Racial Bias, and Whether This Moment Just Changed the League Forever. Is Angel Being Punished… or Targeted?**
The WNBA organizers announced a $25,000 fine for Angel Reese for misconduct after she shouted “f*** you” three times in…
-
Brittney Griner Makes Shocking Prediction: “The WNBA Will Surpass the NFL in 5 Years—And It’s All Because of Angel Reese!” Fans Are Stunned, Critics Are Scoffing, and Social Media Is Exploding Over the Boldest Claim Women’s Sports Has Ever Seen. Could She Actually Be Right?
Brittney Griner claims that the WNBA will be bigger than the NFL in 5 years thanks to Angel Reese. The…
-
Dawn Staley Declares All-Out War to Protect Angel Reese After Caitlin Clark’s Brutal On-Court Assault—“We Will Not Let Her Be Destroyed!” The Legendary Coach’s Explosive Campaign Sparks Uproar, Divides the WNBA, and Has Fans Demanding Justice. Is This the Moment That Redefines Women’s Basketball Forever?
Dawn Staley has launched a campaign to protect Angel Reese at all cost after Caitlin Clark’s vicious assault. Dawn Staley…
-
Stephen & Ayesha Curry Shock Fans with Baby #5 Announcement—Golden State Legend and His Wife Reveal Joyous News That Has the Internet Celebrating! What This Means for Their Growing Family, Career Plans, and the Future of the NBA Power Couple Will Melt Your Heart… and Raise Some Big Questions
BREAKING SPORTS NEWS – NBA Star Stephen Curry and Wife Ayesha Curry Announce Joyous News: Baby Number Five is on…
-
BREAKING: Caitlin Clark Sues Monica McNutt Over “Racist” Accusation—Legal Firestorm Erupts as ESPN Analyst Breaks Down in Tears On-Air. Fans Are Divided, Social Media’s on Fire, and the Case Could Change Athlete-Media Relations Forever. Is This the Scandal That Shatters the WNBA’s Public Image?
The controversy began during a BBC interview, when Monica McNutt, a prominent ESPN analyst and frequent WNBA commentator, was asked…
-
Angel Reese Fined $25,000 After Screaming “F* You” at Caitlin Clark—Three Times! WNBA Drops the Hammer Over Heated Flagrant Foul Incident as Fans Explode Online, Players Pick Sides, and League Officials Scramble to Contain the Fallout from One of the Most Explosive Moments in WNBA History**
The WNBA organizers announced a $25,000 fine for Angel Reese for misconduct after she shouted “f*** you” three times in…
-
Angel Reese Drops Bombshell: Blames 71% NCAA Final Four Viewership Crash on Racist Little Girls—Over 10 Million Fans Gone, and Sports World Reeling. Her Explosive Accusation Ignites National Firestorm About Race, Youth, and Basketball’s Future. Is This the Moment the Sport Can’t Bounce Back From?
Shocking Accusation: Angel Reese Claims Racism by Little Girls Caused 71% Drop in NCAA Final Four Viewership! A Jaw-Dropping Loss…
-
$10 MILLION SHOCKER: Angel Reese isn’t just clapping back—she’s lawyering up. Her lawsuit against Caitlin Clark over “defamatory” on-air remarks has ignited a media firestorm. Is this about trash talk—or something far deeper? The internet can’t stop talking. The courtroom could decide the future of this rivalry.
Angel Reese has initiated a $10 million lawsuit against fellow basketball star Caitlin Clark, accusing her of making defamatory comments…
-
BACKLASH ERUPTS: Shaq’s off-hand comment about Angel Reese wasn’t just “inappropriate”—it lit social media on fire. But no one expected Reese’s ice-cold two-word response to silence the internet. Fans are calling it “a PR knockout” and demanding Shaq issue a public apology. What did she say? Everyone’s stunned.
Shaquille O’Neal Sparks Controversy Over Profane Comment About Angel Reese NBA legend Shaquille O’Neal is facing widespread backlash after calling…
-
CLOAKED ENFORCERS REVEALED: Caitlin Clark isn’t alone anymore—and the league knows it. Fever just added two bruisers known for zero tolerance. Their job? Eliminate dirty tactics before they start. And their first targets? Already rattled. This isn’t a rivalry—it’s a warning. One that could reshape how the WNBA is played.
Caitlin Clark Bullies FURIOUS As Indiana Fever SIGN ENFORCERS To Protect Her! Caitlin Clark Bullies FURIOUS As Indiana Fever SIGN…
-
UNBELIEVABLE KINDNESS: Stephen Curry Fulfills a Dying Child’s Final Wish—But What He Did in Private Left Even Hospital Staff Sobbing
Jason Bennett had always been a fighter. At just 10 years old, he had faced more hospital stays than most…
-
BREAKING: Caitlin Clark Says “ENOUGH!” — Suing ESPN Star Monica McNutt For Defamation In Stunning Move That Has Left Sports Media Shaken And Monica Reportedly In Tears. What was said off-camera that finally pushed Clark to strike back legally? The silence from ESPN is deafening.
Caitlin Clark Breaks Her Silence: Legal Action and the Fallout in the WNBA In a shocking turn of events that…
-
HIDDEN PATTERN EXPOSED: New footage of Caitlin Clark being hit isn’t just another foul—it’s part of a growing secret trend targeting her specifically. Who’s behind it? And why are refs consistently silent? The internet believes it’s not incompetence… it’s coordination.
The Outrage Over Caitlin Clark: A Call for Change in the WNBA What began as a simmering controversy has now…
-
CAITLIN CLARK DIDN’T HAVE TO STOP. BUT SHE DID
The Moment That Melted the WNBA: A Dream, a Sign, and Caitlin Clark’s Unforgettable Response As the golden sun dipped…
-
BOMBSHELL FOOTAGE DROPS Social media sleuths just uncovered the one video that proves Angel Reese’s hate for Caitlin Clark isn’t just rivalry — it’s personal. Fans are SHOCKED by how raw and real the tension is. This just took the beef to a WHOLE NEW LEVEL.
The Intensifying Rivalry: Angel Reese and Caitlin Clark Reignite Sparks in WNBA Season Opener The world of women’s basketball has…
-
Sophie Cunningham Finally Speaks Out After Explosive Allegations Rock the NBA: Accused of Sleeping with Married Suns CEO Josh Bartelstein, the WNBA Star Responds to the Wild Lawsuit—and What She Just Said Is Only Adding Fuel to the Scandalous Fire
Sophie Cunningham Finally Breaks Her Silence After Being Accused Of Sleeping With Suns/Mercury CEO Josh Bartelstein In Wild Lawsuit Sophie…
-
Angel Reese Slapped with $25,000 Fine After Screaming “F* You” at Caitlin Clark—Not Once, But Three Times! WNBA Officials Call It ‘Egregious Misconduct’ as Fans Choose Sides and Social Media Turns Into an All-Out War**
The WNBA organizers announced a $25,000 fine for Angel Reese for misconduct after she shouted “f*** you” three times in…
-
Sophie Cunningham at the Center of NBA Scandal: Shocking Social Media Clues Suggest She Landed a Job with the Phoenix Suns While Lawsuit Alleges a Secret Affair with the Married CEO—Now Fans Are Digging Up Receipts, and the Evidence Is Jaw-Dropping
Social Media Finds Incredible Evidence That Sophie Cunningham May Have Gotten A Phoenix Suns Job Amid Lawsuit Alleging She Slept…
Follow Us s
-
🚨 Whoopi Goldberg LOSES CONTROL After Joe Rogan & Megyn Kelly TORCH The View Live — On-Air Tension Explodes, Hosts Scramble, Social Media Erupts, and a Brutal Backlash Turns a Routine Segment Into a Viral Media Firestorm That Has ABC Executives on Edge
-
🚨 BREAKING: Epstein Files FINALLY Released as Elise Stefanik QUITS Without Warning — Names, Photos, and Sealed Records Trigger Panic in Washington, Allies Go Silent, Power Brokers Scramble Behind Closed Doors, and One Sudden Resignation Raises Explosive Questions About What Was Known, and When
-
The FCC Just Put “The View” on Notice — and Democrats Didn’t Even See It Coming Welcome to the big show—because something major just happened in Washington, and it may spell the beginning of the end for The View. For months on The Trish Regan Show, we’ve said that the clock was ticking for legacy broadcast programs that blur the line between news and partisan activism. After what I heard on Capitol Hill, I can say this plainly: those days are now very limited. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr didn’t just rattle Democrats this week—he exposed how little many of them understand about the basic structure of American media law. And that ignorance may cost ABC dearly. The Cable vs. Network Reality Democrats Keep Ignoring Let’s start with the most important distinction—one Democrats still don’t seem to grasp: Cable is not broadcast. The FCC has no jurisdiction over cable news. None. Zero. Fox News, CNN, MSNBC—those are cable networks. They do not operate under the FCC’s “public interest” standard. But ABC, NBC, CBS, and Fox’s broadcast network absolutely do. Why? Because of the Communications Act of 1934, which created the FCC and granted it authority over the public airwaves. Broadcast networks exist because the government licenses them to use federally regulated spectrum. In exchange, they are required to: Serve the public interest Maintain fairness Avoid intentional news distortion Provide value to the communities they serve That’s not opinion. That’s law. The Senate Showdown That Exposed Everything During a heated exchange, a Democratic senator demanded that Chairman Carr investigate Fox News for editing an interview. Carr’s response was devastatingly simple: Fox News is cable. The FCC has no authority there. No public interest standard. No broadcast hoax rule. No FCC enforcement mechanism. The senator was stunned—not because Carr was wrong, but because she didn’t understand the rules at all. That moment mattered, because it highlighted why CBS and ABC are vulnerable in ways cable networks are not. And it’s exactly why The View is suddenly under pressure. Brendan Carr Says the Quiet Part Out Loud Then came the moment that sent shockwaves through legacy media. When asked whether the FCC is an “independent agency,” Carr responded: “The FCC is not independent.” And then something extraordinary happened. The FCC’s website was updated during the hearing itself—removing the word “independent” from its mission statement in real time. Carr made it unmistakably clear: He works for the president. The FCC has an agenda. And that agenda includes enforcing the law as written. This wasn’t a slip. It was a declaration. Why The View Is Now in the Crosshairs Carr has repeatedly raised concerns about programs that claim “news” status while delivering partisan commentary. Under FCC rules, broadcast programs can avoid equal-time requirements only if they qualify as bona fide news. Late-night comedy shows have often been given that exemption. But Carr openly questioned whether programs like The View still qualify. And it’s a fair question. Is The View delivering journalism—or political activism? Is it informing the public—or misleading it? Is it serving the community—or just pushing one ideology? Those questions now have regulatory consequences. ABC Is Nervous — And They Should Be Behind the scenes, ABC executives are reportedly panicked. They never expected an FCC chairman to say what Carr said—out loud and under oath. Add to that: Declining ratings Repeated legal disclaimers read on-air to avoid liability Growing advertiser unease Open White House criticism And suddenly, The View doesn’t look untouchable anymore. When the White House recently called Joy Behar an “irrelevant loser” suffering from “Trump Derangement Syndrome” and suggested the show could be pulled, it wasn’t idle rhetoric. It was a warning. Legacy Media’s Bigger Problem: The Numbers Don’t Lie At the same time this media reckoning is unfolding, Democrats are facing another brutal reality: the American public has turned on them. A new Quinnipiac poll shows Democrats in Congress are 55 points underwater, with approval ratings below 20%. Among independents, they’re 61 points underwater—the worst numbers ever recorded. CNN had no choice but to report it. Lower than the Dead Sea. Meanwhile, inflation has fallen to 2.7%, housing costs are easing, food prices are coming down, and markets are rallying. Even CNBC’s Steve Liesman was visibly stunned by how fast the numbers improved. And yet the New York Times still tried to blame tariffs. That tells you everything you need to know. A Media Reset Is Already Underway Broadcasters see the writing on the wall. Skydance, which is seeking to acquire CBS, has already promised the FCC it will address bias, appoint an ombudsman, and restore trust. That’s not coincidence. That’s survival. Stephen Colbert’s show reportedly loses millions annually. Ratings across late-night television are collapsing. The audience is gone—and the regulatory protection is now under review. This isn’t censorship. It’s accountability. And, frankly, it’s market discipline. The Bottom Line Brendan Carr didn’t threaten the media. He reminded them of the rules. For decades, legacy broadcasters hid behind prestige and politics. That shield is gone. The FCC has reminded them that broadcast licenses are privileges, not entitlements. If you’re not serving the public interest— If you’re not telling the truth— If you’re running a partisan circus— Then yes, there may be consequences. And for The View, those consequences may be closer than anyone in Hollywood ever imagined.
-
🚨 WATCH: FCC Chair UNLEASHES on ABC, Jimmy Kimmel & The View in LIVE Hearing — Accusations Fly, Networks Squirm, Jaw-Dropping Exchanges Leave Lawmakers Stunned, and a Televised Meltdown Sparks Fears of Fines, Regulation, and a Media Reckoning No One Saw Coming
-
🚨 Erika Kirk CAUGHT in Her NEWEST LIE — Shocking Claims About Her Dating Past UNRAVEL, Receipts Resurface, Old Interviews Contradict Her Story, Supporters Feel Betrayed, Critics Smell a Pattern, and One Small Detail Sparks a Much Bigger Scandal She Can No Longer Explain Away
-
🚨 Whoopi Goldberg LOSES CONTROL After Joe Rogan & Megyn Kelly TORCH The View Live — On-Air Tension Explodes, Hosts Scramble, Social Media Erupts, and a Brutal Backlash Turns a Routine Segment Into a Viral Media Firestorm That Has ABC Executives on Edge
-
🚨 BREAKING: Epstein Files FINALLY Released as Elise Stefanik QUITS Without Warning — Names, Photos, and Sealed Records Trigger Panic in Washington, Allies Go Silent, Power Brokers Scramble Behind Closed Doors, and One Sudden Resignation Raises Explosive Questions About What Was Known, and When
-
The FCC Just Put “The View” on Notice — and Democrats Didn’t Even See It Coming Welcome to the big show—because something major just happened in Washington, and it may spell the beginning of the end for The View. For months on The Trish Regan Show, we’ve said that the clock was ticking for legacy broadcast programs that blur the line between news and partisan activism. After what I heard on Capitol Hill, I can say this plainly: those days are now very limited. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr didn’t just rattle Democrats this week—he exposed how little many of them understand about the basic structure of American media law. And that ignorance may cost ABC dearly. The Cable vs. Network Reality Democrats Keep Ignoring Let’s start with the most important distinction—one Democrats still don’t seem to grasp: Cable is not broadcast. The FCC has no jurisdiction over cable news. None. Zero. Fox News, CNN, MSNBC—those are cable networks. They do not operate under the FCC’s “public interest” standard. But ABC, NBC, CBS, and Fox’s broadcast network absolutely do. Why? Because of the Communications Act of 1934, which created the FCC and granted it authority over the public airwaves. Broadcast networks exist because the government licenses them to use federally regulated spectrum. In exchange, they are required to: Serve the public interest Maintain fairness Avoid intentional news distortion Provide value to the communities they serve That’s not opinion. That’s law. The Senate Showdown That Exposed Everything During a heated exchange, a Democratic senator demanded that Chairman Carr investigate Fox News for editing an interview. Carr’s response was devastatingly simple: Fox News is cable. The FCC has no authority there. No public interest standard. No broadcast hoax rule. No FCC enforcement mechanism. The senator was stunned—not because Carr was wrong, but because she didn’t understand the rules at all. That moment mattered, because it highlighted why CBS and ABC are vulnerable in ways cable networks are not. And it’s exactly why The View is suddenly under pressure. Brendan Carr Says the Quiet Part Out Loud Then came the moment that sent shockwaves through legacy media. When asked whether the FCC is an “independent agency,” Carr responded: “The FCC is not independent.” And then something extraordinary happened. The FCC’s website was updated during the hearing itself—removing the word “independent” from its mission statement in real time. Carr made it unmistakably clear: He works for the president. The FCC has an agenda. And that agenda includes enforcing the law as written. This wasn’t a slip. It was a declaration. Why The View Is Now in the Crosshairs Carr has repeatedly raised concerns about programs that claim “news” status while delivering partisan commentary. Under FCC rules, broadcast programs can avoid equal-time requirements only if they qualify as bona fide news. Late-night comedy shows have often been given that exemption. But Carr openly questioned whether programs like The View still qualify. And it’s a fair question. Is The View delivering journalism—or political activism? Is it informing the public—or misleading it? Is it serving the community—or just pushing one ideology? Those questions now have regulatory consequences. ABC Is Nervous — And They Should Be Behind the scenes, ABC executives are reportedly panicked. They never expected an FCC chairman to say what Carr said—out loud and under oath. Add to that: Declining ratings Repeated legal disclaimers read on-air to avoid liability Growing advertiser unease Open White House criticism And suddenly, The View doesn’t look untouchable anymore. When the White House recently called Joy Behar an “irrelevant loser” suffering from “Trump Derangement Syndrome” and suggested the show could be pulled, it wasn’t idle rhetoric. It was a warning. Legacy Media’s Bigger Problem: The Numbers Don’t Lie At the same time this media reckoning is unfolding, Democrats are facing another brutal reality: the American public has turned on them. A new Quinnipiac poll shows Democrats in Congress are 55 points underwater, with approval ratings below 20%. Among independents, they’re 61 points underwater—the worst numbers ever recorded. CNN had no choice but to report it. Lower than the Dead Sea. Meanwhile, inflation has fallen to 2.7%, housing costs are easing, food prices are coming down, and markets are rallying. Even CNBC’s Steve Liesman was visibly stunned by how fast the numbers improved. And yet the New York Times still tried to blame tariffs. That tells you everything you need to know. A Media Reset Is Already Underway Broadcasters see the writing on the wall. Skydance, which is seeking to acquire CBS, has already promised the FCC it will address bias, appoint an ombudsman, and restore trust. That’s not coincidence. That’s survival. Stephen Colbert’s show reportedly loses millions annually. Ratings across late-night television are collapsing. The audience is gone—and the regulatory protection is now under review. This isn’t censorship. It’s accountability. And, frankly, it’s market discipline. The Bottom Line Brendan Carr didn’t threaten the media. He reminded them of the rules. For decades, legacy broadcasters hid behind prestige and politics. That shield is gone. The FCC has reminded them that broadcast licenses are privileges, not entitlements. If you’re not serving the public interest— If you’re not telling the truth— If you’re running a partisan circus— Then yes, there may be consequences. And for The View, those consequences may be closer than anyone in Hollywood ever imagined.
-
🚨 Erika Kirk CAUGHT in Her NEWEST LIE — Shocking Claims About Her Dating Past UNRAVEL, Receipts Resurface, Old Interviews Contradict Her Story, Supporters Feel Betrayed, Critics Smell a Pattern, and One Small Detail Sparks a Much Bigger Scandal She Can No Longer Explain Away
-
🚨 Whoopi Goldberg LOSES CONTROL After Joe Rogan & Megyn Kelly TORCH The View Live — On-Air Tension Explodes, Hosts Scramble, Social Media Erupts, and a Brutal Backlash Turns a Routine Segment Into a Viral Media Firestorm That Has ABC Executives on Edge
-
🚨 BREAKING: Epstein Files FINALLY Released as Elise Stefanik QUITS Without Warning — Names, Photos, and Sealed Records Trigger Panic in Washington, Allies Go Silent, Power Brokers Scramble Behind Closed Doors, and One Sudden Resignation Raises Explosive Questions About What Was Known, and When
-
The FCC Just Put “The View” on Notice — and Democrats Didn’t Even See It Coming Welcome to the big show—because something major just happened in Washington, and it may spell the beginning of the end for The View. For months on The Trish Regan Show, we’ve said that the clock was ticking for legacy broadcast programs that blur the line between news and partisan activism. After what I heard on Capitol Hill, I can say this plainly: those days are now very limited. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr didn’t just rattle Democrats this week—he exposed how little many of them understand about the basic structure of American media law. And that ignorance may cost ABC dearly. The Cable vs. Network Reality Democrats Keep Ignoring Let’s start with the most important distinction—one Democrats still don’t seem to grasp: Cable is not broadcast. The FCC has no jurisdiction over cable news. None. Zero. Fox News, CNN, MSNBC—those are cable networks. They do not operate under the FCC’s “public interest” standard. But ABC, NBC, CBS, and Fox’s broadcast network absolutely do. Why? Because of the Communications Act of 1934, which created the FCC and granted it authority over the public airwaves. Broadcast networks exist because the government licenses them to use federally regulated spectrum. In exchange, they are required to: Serve the public interest Maintain fairness Avoid intentional news distortion Provide value to the communities they serve That’s not opinion. That’s law. The Senate Showdown That Exposed Everything During a heated exchange, a Democratic senator demanded that Chairman Carr investigate Fox News for editing an interview. Carr’s response was devastatingly simple: Fox News is cable. The FCC has no authority there. No public interest standard. No broadcast hoax rule. No FCC enforcement mechanism. The senator was stunned—not because Carr was wrong, but because she didn’t understand the rules at all. That moment mattered, because it highlighted why CBS and ABC are vulnerable in ways cable networks are not. And it’s exactly why The View is suddenly under pressure. Brendan Carr Says the Quiet Part Out Loud Then came the moment that sent shockwaves through legacy media. When asked whether the FCC is an “independent agency,” Carr responded: “The FCC is not independent.” And then something extraordinary happened. The FCC’s website was updated during the hearing itself—removing the word “independent” from its mission statement in real time. Carr made it unmistakably clear: He works for the president. The FCC has an agenda. And that agenda includes enforcing the law as written. This wasn’t a slip. It was a declaration. Why The View Is Now in the Crosshairs Carr has repeatedly raised concerns about programs that claim “news” status while delivering partisan commentary. Under FCC rules, broadcast programs can avoid equal-time requirements only if they qualify as bona fide news. Late-night comedy shows have often been given that exemption. But Carr openly questioned whether programs like The View still qualify. And it’s a fair question. Is The View delivering journalism—or political activism? Is it informing the public—or misleading it? Is it serving the community—or just pushing one ideology? Those questions now have regulatory consequences. ABC Is Nervous — And They Should Be Behind the scenes, ABC executives are reportedly panicked. They never expected an FCC chairman to say what Carr said—out loud and under oath. Add to that: Declining ratings Repeated legal disclaimers read on-air to avoid liability Growing advertiser unease Open White House criticism And suddenly, The View doesn’t look untouchable anymore. When the White House recently called Joy Behar an “irrelevant loser” suffering from “Trump Derangement Syndrome” and suggested the show could be pulled, it wasn’t idle rhetoric. It was a warning. Legacy Media’s Bigger Problem: The Numbers Don’t Lie At the same time this media reckoning is unfolding, Democrats are facing another brutal reality: the American public has turned on them. A new Quinnipiac poll shows Democrats in Congress are 55 points underwater, with approval ratings below 20%. Among independents, they’re 61 points underwater—the worst numbers ever recorded. CNN had no choice but to report it. Lower than the Dead Sea. Meanwhile, inflation has fallen to 2.7%, housing costs are easing, food prices are coming down, and markets are rallying. Even CNBC’s Steve Liesman was visibly stunned by how fast the numbers improved. And yet the New York Times still tried to blame tariffs. That tells you everything you need to know. A Media Reset Is Already Underway Broadcasters see the writing on the wall. Skydance, which is seeking to acquire CBS, has already promised the FCC it will address bias, appoint an ombudsman, and restore trust. That’s not coincidence. That’s survival. Stephen Colbert’s show reportedly loses millions annually. Ratings across late-night television are collapsing. The audience is gone—and the regulatory protection is now under review. This isn’t censorship. It’s accountability. And, frankly, it’s market discipline. The Bottom Line Brendan Carr didn’t threaten the media. He reminded them of the rules. For decades, legacy broadcasters hid behind prestige and politics. That shield is gone. The FCC has reminded them that broadcast licenses are privileges, not entitlements. If you’re not serving the public interest— If you’re not telling the truth— If you’re running a partisan circus— Then yes, there may be consequences. And for The View, those consequences may be closer than anyone in Hollywood ever imagined.
-
🚨 WATCH: FCC Chair UNLEASHES on ABC, Jimmy Kimmel & The View in LIVE Hearing — Accusations Fly, Networks Squirm, Jaw-Dropping Exchanges Leave Lawmakers Stunned, and a Televised Meltdown Sparks Fears of Fines, Regulation, and a Media Reckoning No One Saw Coming