Candace Owens Escalates Feud as Conspiracy Battle Over Charlie Kirk’s Assassination Intensifies

Candace Owens has entered yet another round of conflict as she continues her self-proclaimed mission to uncover “the truth” behind Charlie Kirk’s assassination. After publicly criticizing several conservative figures—including Charlie’s grieving wife Erica, Turning Point USA executives, and even close family friends—Owens has now directed her attention toward Christian commentator Allie Beth Stuckey.

Stuckey, host of the podcast Relatable, recently posted an Instagram video urging her followers to think critically before embracing online conspiracies. Though she never mentioned Owens by name, Owens immediately assumed the message was aimed at her—and launched a direct counterattack on her show, accusing Stuckey of ignoring evidence, minimizing lies told by Turning Point USA, and failing to care about Charlie Kirk’s death.

But the situation has grown even more combustible. Owens also targeted theologian Frank Turek, a longtime mentor to Charlie Kirk and one of the men who accompanied him moments before the fatal shot was fired. On CBN, Turek responded plainly, expressing sadness over Owens’ accusations.

“She’s making suggestions without evidence,” he said. “Anything is possible, but not everything has evidence behind it.”
He emphasized that prosecutors rarely reveal their full case and warned that Owens’ speculation was painful to the people still grieving Charlie’s loss.

Owens fired back immediately, mocking critics who “claim they didn’t watch all the episodes” and insisting she has presented detailed timelines, webs of connections, and documented lies. She then publicly invited Frank Turek onto her show—though skeptics questioned whether she was seeking answers or attempting to escalate the drama.

Allie Beth Stuckey Responds With a Calm but Devastating Rebuke

After Owens accused Stuckey of not caring enough about Charlie, Stuckey released a measured, heartfelt response. Her message, far from inflammatory, struck a chord with viewers:

“I’m not worried about Charlie Kirk? My friend? The man I have spoken about countless times since he was killed?” she asked, visibly emotional.
“To imply I don’t care… it’s incredibly hurtful.”

Instead of trading insults, Stuckey chose to anchor her response in scripture, responsibility, and integrity. She refused to engage in conspiracy rabbit holes and declined to “fact-check” Owens point-by-point, knowing it would only lead to endless conflict.

“I can’t compete with secret sources,” she said gently. “Candace claims Charlie came to her in a dream. I don’t have that. So I’ll focus on truth, the weight of our words, and the impact they have on real people.”

Many praised Stuckey for handling a volatile situation with grace while refusing to compromise her convictions.

The Core Dispute: Who “Really Cares” About Charlie Kirk?

Owens has repeatedly suggested that she—and her network of anonymous “decentralized agents”—are the only ones truly fighting for justice. In her view:

Erica Kirk

Charlie’s closest friends

Turning Point USA

Eyewitnesses

Investigators

Pastors

Family mentors

…have all failed him.

Instead, Owens claims to have uncovered evidence pointing to an international plot involving Egypt—based on flight logs she and her supporters spent hours analyzing. Critics, including Stuckey, argue that Owens is presenting assumptions as conclusions and drawing lines between dots that may not be connected.

A Lighter Moment in the Chaos

Amid the tension, comedian Melissa Daughtry released a parody reenacting Owens’ now-infamous CNN interview—mocking her dramatic contradictions, vague “sources,” dream revelations, and lack of verifiable proof. The viral skit poked fun at Owens’ insistence that Tyler Robinson, the charged shooter, is innocent despite overwhelming evidence.

The parody’s most cutting line:
“Girl, you don’t need a podcast… you’d make a great cult leader.”

Where Does the Drama Go From Here?

The growing divide between Candace Owens and mainstream conservative Christian commentators marks a significant shift in the American right. More leaders—including pastors, YouTubers, and friends of the Kirk family—are now openly distancing themselves from Owens’ theories.

The question remains:
Is Candace uncovering a conspiracy that others are too afraid to touch?
Or is she feeding a narrative that brings attention, emotion, and conflict—but no concrete evidence?

As of now, Candace continues promising “more receipts,” while critics predict more claims without documentation.

One thing is certain:
What began as a tragedy has now become a defining cultural clash within the conservative movement—one that shows no signs of ending soon.