🚨 BREAKING: JAMES COMEY FIGHTS BACK — FILES MOTION TO DISMISS ALL CHARGES, ACCUSING DOJ OF “VINDICTIVE” AND “SELECTIVE” PROSECUTION 💥
In a stunning legal counterattack, former FBI Director James Comey has filed a motion to dismiss all federal charges against him — claiming that he’s the target of a “vindictive” and “selective” prosecution driven by politics rather than justice.
Comey’s legal team submitted the filing late Monday night, attaching multiple social media posts from former President Donald Trump himself as evidence of what they call “open hostility and explicit intent to punish.”
“This prosecution is not about the law — it’s about vengeance,” the motion states. “When the government acts under political pressure to destroy a critic, the Constitution demands dismissal.”
⚖️ A LEGAL BOMB DROPPED
The motion argues that Trump’s public statements — many of which directly attacked Comey by name — created a political environment where prosecutors felt pressure to indict regardless of evidence.
Legal experts note that if a judge agrees, the entire case could be thrown out before trial, a rare but powerful rebuke of prosecutorial abuse.
“Vindictive prosecution claims are difficult to prove,” said one constitutional attorney familiar with the case, “but Comey’s team appears to have assembled a surprisingly strong record of bias — straight from Trump’s own words.”
Among the exhibits attached to the motion are screenshots of Trump’s posts accusing Comey of “treason” and promising to “make him pay.”
💥 POLITICAL EARTHQUAKE
This filing marks a dramatic escalation in one of the most politically charged legal battles in recent memory.
Comey, who led the FBI during the early stages of the Trump-Russia investigation, has long been a target of Trump’s public fury.
Now, his attorneys say that same fury infected the Justice Department itself, turning what should have been a neutral process into what one filing calls “a weapon of retribution.”
The motion also accuses senior DOJ officials of selectively enforcing laws against political opponents, citing comparable cases that were never prosecuted.
🚨 WHAT HAPPENS NEXT
The court is expected to review Comey’s motion within the next two weeks. If the judge finds credible evidence of political motivation, the charges could be dismissed in full — before a single witness is called.
That outcome would not only be a personal victory for Comey but a major public embarrassment for the Justice Department and the Trump legal team.
Meanwhile, Trump’s representatives have not yet responded to the motion, though several of his allies online have already dismissed it as “grandstanding.”
News
🚨 MUST-SEE CLASH: Jasmine Crockett reportedly fires back at Nancy Mace following an alleged physical threat, igniting a heated public showdown. Social media explodes as supporters rally, critics debate, and insiders warn this confrontation could have major political and personal repercussions for both parties involved.
I’m joined today by Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett to discuss a recent clash with Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace during the latest…
🚨 CRISIS ALERT: Pam Bondi reportedly faces intense scrutiny over mishandling of Epstein-related files, igniting speculation about accountability, political fallout, and potential legal consequences. As pressure mounts from media and insiders, questions swirl about what was ignored, who knew, and how far-reaching the consequences of these failures could really be.
Being at the top of an institution like the FBI doesn’t mean you can control it. The bureaucracy beneath you…
🚨 LIVE TV MELTDOWN: Schiff’s question, “Who moved Maxwell?”, reportedly exposes Patel’s conflicting statements, sparking a 94-second on-air meltdown that shocked viewers. As tensions boil and political insiders scramble, questions about credibility, accountability, and what was really happening behind the scenes dominate the headlines.
In just 90 seconds, one question about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer exposed the biggest lie FBI Director Cash Paddle ever…
🚨 SHOCKING REVELATION: Massie reportedly names 20 alleged Epstein clients, and just 67 seconds later, Patel’s repeated “no names” claim unravels, sending shockwaves through politics and media. Careers tremble, reputations hang in the balance, and insiders question who knew what—and how much truth was being hidden all along.
67 Seconds That Shattered the FBI: Thomas Massie Exposes Cash Patel On September 17th, 2025, at 10:47 a.m., in the…
🚨 BREAKING: Erika Kirk reportedly slips up on live TV, sparking explosive questions and sending Candace Owens into a frenzy demanding answers. Social media erupts with speculation about hidden agendas, missing details, and the whereabouts of Charlie Kirk, leaving allies and critics alike stunned by what could unfold next.
The Erica Kirk and TPUSA Controversy: A Deep Dive Things are getting increasingly bizarre. The latest rumors suggest that Erica…
🚨 UPDATE SHOCKER: Newly surfaced details about Erika’s dating past are fueling a darker narrative that’s rapidly reshaping the story and blindsiding commentators. As claims spread and timelines shift, critics say everything has changed—while an unexpected Alex Jones stumble adds chaos, confusion, and fresh questions no one can ignore.
New allegations are circulating online about Erica Kirk — allegations that, if true, raise serious questions. To be clear from…
End of content
No more pages to load






