This segment explores claims that the Russia investigation was allegedly linked to actions by the Hillary Clinton campaign during the 2016 election. Tulsi Gabbard and Megyn Kelly provide a detailed critique of Clinton’s political career, focusing on her email scandal, foreign policy decisions, and media management.

Gabbard draws on her firsthand experience in Democratic politics to scrutinize Clinton’s foreign policy record, highlighting perceived contradictions and decisions with far-reaching consequences in the Middle East. She emphasizes the gap between Clinton’s stated ideals and her actual actions, particularly regarding interventions and military decisions.

Kelly focuses on Clinton’s public image and communications strategy, portraying a politician whose carefully managed persona often failed to resonate with voters. She critiques the reliance on scripted speeches, staged empathy, and media control, arguing that authenticity was sacrificed in favor of optics. Both Kelly and Gabbard point to missed opportunities to connect with grassroots movements and working-class Americans, suggesting that these missteps contributed to her 2016 election loss.

The discussion also touches on the controversial Steele dossier and CrowdStrike’s involvement, with the claim that these were part of efforts to counterbalance attention on Clinton’s email scandal. Gabbard frames these events as indicative of a broader pattern of political strategy aimed at shaping narratives and deflecting criticism.

Overall, Kelly and Gabbard present a combined critique of Clinton’s political trajectory, emphasizing overconfidence, ambition, and a disconnect from voters as central factors in her challenges and perceived failures. They frame her story as a lesson in the importance of authenticity, accountability, and the consequences of political overreach.