DOJ LEAKS, THREATS, ARMSTRONG WILLIAMS, & THE DARK SHADOW BEHIND CHARLIE KIRK’S DEATH
Let’s start at the beginning. Tuesday morning, Coach Colin went live and immediately dropped a bombshell: a second DOJ leak had emerged, and this time it included a chilling message that directly referenced Charlie Kirk — a message so threatening that anyone reading it would feel the temperature drop.
If you remember the first DOJ leak from five days ago, you might’ve assumed it was an isolated incident. But now, things have escalated far beyond that. The anonymous leaker — the same person who provided the original text exchange — has now been exposed, and that exposure triggered a direct warning. A warning referencing Charlie Kirk’s death as an example of what happens when someone “steps out of line.”
Project Veritas confirmed to Coach Colin that these communications are real, verified, and not fabricated. Meaning this isn’t an internet rumor. It’s not a fringe conspiracy. It’s a glimpse into something very real happening beneath the surface of American political power.

1. THE TARGET: CANDACE OWENS — AND THE “ORDER” SHE CLAIMS WAS LAID OUT
This entire chain reaction began when Candace Owens publicly read a message she said she received from a high-ranking French government official. The content was so extreme that many mocked her, calling her delusional. But then the DOJ leaks came out — and suddenly, her claims didn’t look so far-fetched.
Candace revealed:
A green-lit assassination team
One member allegedly Israeli
Multiple governments allegedly involved
Motivation tied to her and Charlie Kirk’s statements
Her claim? That French President Emmanuel Macron wanted her “removed.”
People laughed it off — until Veritas dropped the first wave of DOJ text messages:
Plans to entrap her using young people
Direct efforts to gather material to jail her
Explicit goals to destroy her reputation
Surveillance not only on Candace but her husband
One message writer even said they were “so enraged with Candace that it consumes their mind.”
These weren’t trolls. These were people speaking with power and confidence — people who believed they could operate without consequences.
2. THE NEW LEAK: “LOOK AT WHAT HAPPENED TO CHARLIE KIRK.”
Then came the second leak — the most disturbing part.
A phone number with a 202 Washington D.C. area code (matching where Armstrong Williams lives and works) sent the leaker a message:
“You think I don’t know you gave the messages to Veritas?
You’re alive because of me.
Bar is losing patience.
Look closely at what happened to Charlie Kirk before you do anything stupid.”
This wasn’t subtle.
This wasn’t coded.
This was a direct assertion of power.
And the implications were immediate:
Charlie Kirk wasn’t just killed by a random unhinged individual.
Someone somewhere appears to believe they “allowed” it.
And they’re now using his death as a warning.
When Veritas posted the leak, they tagged Armstrong Williams — a powerful media figure, owner of television networks, employer of high-profile hosts, and someone with a long public record of lawsuits and scandals. Veritas said they had verified the phone number as belonging to him.
To this moment, Armstrong has not denied it.
3. ARMSTRONG WILLIAMS — NOT A STRANGER TO THE PLAYERS
What makes this chilling is that Armstrong isn’t some random outsider.
He has appeared onstage with both Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens.
He knows the ecosystem.
He has influence, networks, and resources.
Armstrong’s public controversies include:
Multiple lawsuits over inappropriate sexual conduct
Alleged misuse of media power
A long history of behind-the-scenes political involvement
Accusations relating to visa scams
Ownership of major stations, giving him substantial reach and leverage
If someone powerful wanted a critic intimidated or silenced… this is exactly the kind of figure who could plausibly exert that pressure.
4. THE MOST TERRIFYING PART: THIS IS ALL SAID OUT LOUD
One thing stands out:
Nothing in the messages is hidden.
No coded language.
No cloak-and-dagger phrasing.
It reads like people who know:
Police won’t intervene
Media won’t report
No law enforcement agency will protect the targets
They’re untouchable
Charlie Kirk told Megyn Kelly that he had been receiving “dozens” of frightening messages before his death. Tucker Carlson publicly described how a major donor stormed backstage and screamed at Charlie for crossing a political line.
This is the culture behind the curtain.
In this world, warnings aren’t metaphors.
5. THEORIES THAT EMERGED AFTER THE LEAK
Once the messages were published, people began making connections — none of them proven, but all of them unsettling possibilities. Some of the speculation includes:
• Is “Black” in the first leak referring to Leon Black?
The billionaire who paid $160–170 million to Jeffrey Epstein.
The phrase “bring him some younger…” sent shivers down readers’ spines.
• Was “photographer” actually code for “shooter”?
Some believe the word was a substitution to mask intent.
• Was “Blank” meant to refer to Matt Gaetz?
Because the text described a smear campaign resembling what Gaetz claimed he faced.
None of these theories are confirmed — but none are impossible given the context.
6. THE EMERGING PATTERN
When you stitch every piece together, a chilling picture forms:
Candace Owens says she’s targeted → everyone mocks her
Veritas leaks DOJ texts → her claims look much less crazy
The whistleblower gets a death threat → referencing Charlie Kirk
The number matches Armstrong Williams → a real, powerful figure
Charlie Kirk said he was receiving threats → right before he died
The threat suggests his death was not random
This is not TikTok drama.
This is political black operations — the kind that many people suspected existed but had never seen exposed so directly.
The leaked messages reveal a disturbing truth:
Some individuals possess enough power to threaten, surveil, smear, imprison, or eliminate anyone who becomes a threat — and they feel safe enough to say it plainly.
Candace Owens, Project Veritas, and even the anonymous leaker are now facing very real danger.
News
🚨 BREAKING: Pam Bondi reportedly faces ouster at the DOJ amid a fresh debacle highlighting alleged incompetence and mismanagement. As media and insiders dissect the fallout, questions swirl about accountability, political consequences, and who might replace her—while critics claim this marks a turning point in ongoing institutional controversies.
DOJ Missteps, Government Waste, and the Holiday Spirit Welcome to the big show, everyone. I’m Trish Regan, and first, let…
🚨 FIERY HEARING: Jasmine Crockett reportedly dominates a Louisiana racist opponent during a tense public hearing, delivering sharp rebuttals and sparking nationwide attention. Social media erupts as supporters cheer, critics react, and insiders debate the political and cultural impact, leaving many questioning how this showdown will shape her rising influence.
Protecting Individual Rights and Promoting Equality: A Congressional Debate In a recent session at Congress, members from both sides of…
🚨 ON-AIR DISASTER: “The View” hosts reportedly booed off the street after controversial prison comments backfired, sparking public outrage and media frenzy. Ratings reportedly plunge further as social media erupts, insiders scramble to contain the fallout, and critics question whether the show can recover from this unprecedented backlash.
ABC’s The View continues to struggle with declining ratings, and much of the blame is being placed on hosts Sunny…
🚨 LIVE COLLAPSE: Mrvan’s question, “Where did the data go?”, reportedly exposed Patel’s “100% confident” claim as false just 47 seconds later, sparking an intense on-air meltdown. Critics and insiders question credibility, accountability, and transparency, as the incident sends shockwaves through politics and media circles alike.
On March 18, 2025, during a House Judiciary Committee hearing, Congressman Frank Mirvan exposed a major FBI data security breach….
🚨 LIVE SHOCKER: Hillary Clinton reportedly reels as Megyn Kelly and Tulsi Gabbard call her out on live television, sparking a viral political confrontation. With tensions high, viewers are debating the fallout, insiders weigh in, and questions arise about Clinton’s response and the potential impact on her legacy.
This segment explores claims that the Russia investigation was allegedly linked to actions by the Hillary Clinton campaign during the…
🚨 MUST-SEE CLASH: Jasmine Crockett reportedly fires back at Nancy Mace following an alleged physical threat, igniting a heated public showdown. Social media explodes as supporters rally, critics debate, and insiders warn this confrontation could have major political and personal repercussions for both parties involved.
I’m joined today by Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett to discuss a recent clash with Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace during the latest…
End of content
No more pages to load





