Candace Owens Claims French Government Plot Against Her Life: Explosive Allegations Spark Global Attention

In a series of recent claims that have shocked social media, conservative commentator Candace Owens alleges that the French government has plotted to assassinate her. The explosive statements, made across her podcast and social media channels, have sparked widespread controversy and intense debate.

The Allegation

Owens claims she was contacted by a high-ranking French government official who provided information suggesting that President Emmanuel Macron and his inner circle authorized an assassination attempt against her. According to Owens, the plot involves:

A professional team, including French legionnaires and at least one Israeli operative.

Alleged ties to Charlie Kirk’s assassination, with claims of coordinated intelligence operations.

Payments funneled through a French establishment referred to as Club Descent, leaving a possible paper trail.

Owens released a public warning, urging Americans and her followers to share the information widely due to the seriousness of the alleged threat.

Why Owens Believes the Threat is Credible

Owens insists her claims are not baseless:

She has access to intelligence, legal experts, and security professionals.

Given the severity of the claim—an alleged government-backed assassination plot—Owens argues that she would face severe legal consequences if it were false.

Owens has previously exposed controversial stories, including alleged misconduct involving Macron and underage exploitation networks, lending her credibility in her own assessment.

She tweeted that her information comes from someone with proximity to the French first couple, claiming it is credible enough to warrant public disclosure.

Public Reaction and Support

Owens’ claims have drawn skepticism and ridicule online, particularly from mainstream media and social media “debunkers.”

Some supporters, including Pavel Durov, founder of Telegram, have vouched for the plausibility of her warnings, citing her track record of exposing controversial information.

Owens argues the threat is part of a pipeline of cancellation and suppression, escalating from media attacks to platform bans, financial pressures, and now potential physical threats.

The Broader Context

Owens’ claims intersect with global politics and intelligence operations:

Allegations link the plot to previous controversial operations, including claims about French involvement in Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

Critics argue that such claims verge on conspiracy, while supporters suggest they are consistent with historical cases of state-linked covert operations.

Owens highlights the potential role of intelligence agencies in both the United States and France, emphasizing the need for transparency and public awareness.

Conclusion

Whether one believes Owens’ allegations or not, the claims highlight the dangerous intersection of politics, intelligence, and media influence. Owens remains a polarizing figure: a commentator with a massive global following, capable of shaping discourse across the political spectrum.

Her warnings also underscore a modern reality for outspoken media figures: the escalation from cancellation and smear campaigns to potential legal and physical threats. Owens insists her life and the lives of her associates may be at risk, urging her audience and relevant authorities to take the claims seriously and protect truth-tellers at all costs.

This is a serious, high-stakes situation that continues to evolve. Owens’ followers and critics alike are watching closely as more information emerges, potentially reshaping public conversations around freedom of speech, international threats, and the protection of public figures.