Multiple clips of Charlie Kirk are going viral right now—and they’re not making him look good. At the same time, his widow Erica Kirk is getting blasted by far-right figures for her behavior after his death, with many calling it “strange,” “insensitive,” or flat-out “bizarre.”
Let’s start with the clips, because they are brutal.

Charlie Kirk built his brand on “owning libs on campus.” His whole shtick was: I’ll debate anyone, anywhere. Except… he usually debated freshmen who weren’t prepared. Then he would upload the clips where he looked dominant.

But Cambridge? Completely different story. And he got destroyed—publicly, repeatedly.

CLIP 1: Gay Marriage Debate – Cambridge Student Dunks on Him

A Cambridge student calmly dismantled Charlie’s talking points:

Student:
“So many ancient societies accepted same-sex relationships or third genders long before Western conservatism existed. When you say conservative values are universal truth, aren’t you just repeating a selective modern ideology?”

Charlie tries to salvage it:

“Point to a great power that endorsed same-sex marriage. Marriage, not cohabitation.”

Student:
“Ancient Mesopotamia.”

Charlie:
“And how did that work out for them?”

Student:
“Perfectly fine. It was totally normal.”

Charlie pauses… then says:

“Okay. Well, I still think it’s wrong.”

And that’s the moment he exposed himself. His argument wasn’t about history, facts, or “universal truth.” It was feelings. Purely feelings.

He contradicted his own entire setup.

CLIP 2: Cambridge Professor – Ukraine Debate

Charlie tries debating a Cambridge professor, and immediately face-plants.

Charlie:
“Ukraine is bad because Zelensky refuses to hold elections!”

Professor:
“He can’t. It’s unconstitutional under martial law.”

Charlie:
“That’s not true. He can call a snap election. He’s basically a dictator.”

Professor:
“So… your argument is that Zelensky is a dictator because he follows his constitution, and to fix that, he should violate it?”

Charlie stumbles through contradictions. Every path he takes leads back to the same flawed argument. He basically proves the professor’s point: his thesis makes no sense unless you’re pushing a Russian narrative.

CLIP 3: Budget Lies

Next, Charlie gets exposed for spreading misinformation:

Charlie:
“His budget cuts $1.5 trillion! I wish it was more!”

Professor:
“That’s simply not true.”

Charlie insists—but the professor calmly explains how income tax, capital gains, and “ultra-wealthy” tax structures actually work. Charlie clearly has no idea. It’s painful.

You can watch these all day. The “master debater” collapses when he finally faces real opposition.

Erica Kirk – Now the Right Is Turning on Her

And now things get even more bizarre. Erica Kirk is being criticized not by liberals… but by the far-right itself. Even Nick Fuentes—a white nationalist—called her behavior “weird,” “off,” and “inappropriate.”

Here’s why.

Just days after Charlie Kirk was assassinated, here’s how Erica spoke about him:

“We have Sunday specials lined up. Charlie made sure we recorded everything. We have speeches no one’s heard, interviews no one’s seen, content from Korea and Japan… so buckle up—there’s a LOT coming!”

She says this laughing, smiling, practically excited.

Even people who liked her were like:
“Uh… what??”

Nick Fuentes—of all people—said:

“Lady… didn’t your husband’s face just get blown off like 2 seconds ago?
Is this WrestleMania or a funeral?”

He pointed out the merch booths, pyrotechnics, headset commentators, fundraising appeals… all happening at the memorial.

And then the next day?

People got mass-texts from Erica:

“I miss him every time I blink. Every beat of my heart.
Donate $5, $15, $25…”

Even people sympathetic to her said the same thing:
Something is off.

Is it fair to judge someone’s grief? Not really. But the combination of:

Immediately promoting “Charlie content”

Raising millions

Smiling and laughing

Talking about how “excited” she is

Turning his death into a content-launch

…feels exploitative to many, even within her political circle.

And unfortunately, that’s why she’s now under fire—not from her critics, but from her own side.