Trump Administration Revokes Visas Over Celebrations of Charlie Kirk’s Assassination
The Trump administration has reportedly taken the unprecedented step of revoking the visas of certain foreign nationals who publicly celebrated the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, according to reporting from The Daily Wire.
Last month, Secretary of State Marco Rubio pledged to take decisive action against foreigners who praised or supported Kirk’s killing, describing such celebrations as “beyond the bounds of acceptable behavior” and “a direct affront to American values.”
“We will revoke visas and deny entry to anyone who glorifies violence against Americans, period,” Rubio said in a statement at the time.
Visa Revocations Implemented
In line with this promise, the State Department reportedly shared the statements of several visa-holders who had publicly celebrated Kirk’s assassination. While the department has not released the names of those affected, officials indicated that their remarks — posted online or delivered through public forums — were deemed a violation of the conditions under which visas are issued.
“Foreign nationals admitted to the United States enjoy protections and privileges under U.S. law, but celebrating the killing of an American citizen crosses a clear line,” a State Department spokesperson told The Daily Wire.
Sources indicate that revocations affected both temporary and long-term visa holders, including those visiting for education, work, or cultural exchange.
Political and Public Reaction
The move has already sparked debate over the limits of free expression versus the conditions of legal entry. Supporters of the revocation argue that celebrating the assassination of a prominent U.S. citizen constitutes a threat to national security and undermines international norms.
“There’s no place in American society for glorifying violence against our citizens,” said a senior Republican strategist. “These visa revocations send a clear message that such behavior has consequences.”
Critics, however, have raised concerns about potential overreach and the implications for civil liberties and diplomatic norms.
“While violence should never be celebrated, revoking visas based on political speech — even speech abhorrent to us — is a slippery slope,” said a foreign policy analyst familiar with the matter. “We have to balance national security with fundamental principles of free expression.”
Turning Point USA Responds
Turning Point USA, the organization founded by Kirk, welcomed the administration’s actions. In a statement, the group described the revocations as “an appropriate and necessary step to protect the memory of Charlie Kirk and defend the safety of Americans.”
“Celebrating violence against an American citizen is unacceptable,” the statement read. “We commend Secretary Rubio and the Trump administration for taking swift action.”
Broader Implications
While the revocation of visas in response to politically charged speech is unusual, legal experts note that non-citizens in the United States are subject to conditions that differ from constitutional free speech protections afforded to citizens. The administration’s actions could set a precedent for future cases in which foreign nationals publicly praise or incite violence against Americans.
As details continue to emerge, both supporters and critics will likely scrutinize the line between speech, action, and the legal boundaries of visa privileges.
News
🚨 MUST-SEE CLASH: Jasmine Crockett reportedly fires back at Nancy Mace following an alleged physical threat, igniting a heated public showdown. Social media explodes as supporters rally, critics debate, and insiders warn this confrontation could have major political and personal repercussions for both parties involved.
I’m joined today by Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett to discuss a recent clash with Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace during the latest…
🚨 CRISIS ALERT: Pam Bondi reportedly faces intense scrutiny over mishandling of Epstein-related files, igniting speculation about accountability, political fallout, and potential legal consequences. As pressure mounts from media and insiders, questions swirl about what was ignored, who knew, and how far-reaching the consequences of these failures could really be.
Being at the top of an institution like the FBI doesn’t mean you can control it. The bureaucracy beneath you…
🚨 LIVE TV MELTDOWN: Schiff’s question, “Who moved Maxwell?”, reportedly exposes Patel’s conflicting statements, sparking a 94-second on-air meltdown that shocked viewers. As tensions boil and political insiders scramble, questions about credibility, accountability, and what was really happening behind the scenes dominate the headlines.
In just 90 seconds, one question about Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer exposed the biggest lie FBI Director Cash Paddle ever…
🚨 SHOCKING REVELATION: Massie reportedly names 20 alleged Epstein clients, and just 67 seconds later, Patel’s repeated “no names” claim unravels, sending shockwaves through politics and media. Careers tremble, reputations hang in the balance, and insiders question who knew what—and how much truth was being hidden all along.
67 Seconds That Shattered the FBI: Thomas Massie Exposes Cash Patel On September 17th, 2025, at 10:47 a.m., in the…
🚨 BREAKING: Erika Kirk reportedly slips up on live TV, sparking explosive questions and sending Candace Owens into a frenzy demanding answers. Social media erupts with speculation about hidden agendas, missing details, and the whereabouts of Charlie Kirk, leaving allies and critics alike stunned by what could unfold next.
The Erica Kirk and TPUSA Controversy: A Deep Dive Things are getting increasingly bizarre. The latest rumors suggest that Erica…
🚨 UPDATE SHOCKER: Newly surfaced details about Erika’s dating past are fueling a darker narrative that’s rapidly reshaping the story and blindsiding commentators. As claims spread and timelines shift, critics say everything has changed—while an unexpected Alex Jones stumble adds chaos, confusion, and fresh questions no one can ignore.
New allegations are circulating online about Erica Kirk — allegations that, if true, raise serious questions. To be clear from…
End of content
No more pages to load






