Trump Administration Revokes Visas Over Celebrations of Charlie Kirk’s Assassination

The Trump administration has reportedly taken the unprecedented step of revoking the visas of certain foreign nationals who publicly celebrated the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, according to reporting from The Daily Wire.

Last month, Secretary of State Marco Rubio pledged to take decisive action against foreigners who praised or supported Kirk’s killing, describing such celebrations as “beyond the bounds of acceptable behavior” and “a direct affront to American values.”

“We will revoke visas and deny entry to anyone who glorifies violence against Americans, period,” Rubio said in a statement at the time.

Rubio Promises To Block Visas Of Foreigners Who Cheer Charlie Kirk's Death

Visa Revocations Implemented

In line with this promise, the State Department reportedly shared the statements of several visa-holders who had publicly celebrated Kirk’s assassination. While the department has not released the names of those affected, officials indicated that their remarks — posted online or delivered through public forums — were deemed a violation of the conditions under which visas are issued.

“Foreign nationals admitted to the United States enjoy protections and privileges under U.S. law, but celebrating the killing of an American citizen crosses a clear line,” a State Department spokesperson told The Daily Wire.

Sources indicate that revocations affected both temporary and long-term visa holders, including those visiting for education, work, or cultural exchange.

Political and Public Reaction

The move has already sparked debate over the limits of free expression versus the conditions of legal entry. Supporters of the revocation argue that celebrating the assassination of a prominent U.S. citizen constitutes a threat to national security and undermines international norms.

“There’s no place in American society for glorifying violence against our citizens,” said a senior Republican strategist. “These visa revocations send a clear message that such behavior has consequences.”

Critics, however, have raised concerns about potential overreach and the implications for civil liberties and diplomatic norms.

“While violence should never be celebrated, revoking visas based on political speech — even speech abhorrent to us — is a slippery slope,” said a foreign policy analyst familiar with the matter. “We have to balance national security with fundamental principles of free expression.”

Turning Point USA Responds

Turning Point USA, the organization founded by Kirk, welcomed the administration’s actions. In a statement, the group described the revocations as “an appropriate and necessary step to protect the memory of Charlie Kirk and defend the safety of Americans.”

“Celebrating violence against an American citizen is unacceptable,” the statement read. “We commend Secretary Rubio and the Trump administration for taking swift action.”

Broader Implications

While the revocation of visas in response to politically charged speech is unusual, legal experts note that non-citizens in the United States are subject to conditions that differ from constitutional free speech protections afforded to citizens. The administration’s actions could set a precedent for future cases in which foreign nationals publicly praise or incite violence against Americans.

As details continue to emerge, both supporters and critics will likely scrutinize the line between speech, action, and the legal boundaries of visa privileges.